GOD
DOES HAVE AN OPINION ON GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
ISAIAH
10 Crime Under the Color of Law
Charles
e Whisnant, Pastor/Teacher April 03 2013
Vs. 1 Crime Under The
Color of Law. Those who were to be writing laws were to be for
the good of the people. The court of law are answerable to God.
Decisions will be reviewed.
Vs. 2 JUDGMENT:
i.e. sentence, lawsuit, causes or pleas. RIGHTS: a verdict.
Pronounced judicially. 400 occurrence in the O.T.. A function of the
Government. Any aspect of civil or religious government. 200 + cases
deal with the act of deciding a case of litigation brought before
civil magistrates
In Hebrew scriptures the
ultimately authoritative power (sovereignty) is not found in
documents by in God: Deuteronomy 1:17; Psalms 72:1,2; 108:19;
Proverbs 16:33; Jeremiah 8:7
Justice is primarily an
attribute of God: Isaiah 30:18; Genesis 18:25 God loves
judgment, righteousness, Psalms 37:28,30.
zerj
Vs. 3 An
intervention, in order to bring about a great change in the
situation. Jeremiah 5:9. God is continually calling the world into
account.
“What will you do in
that day?” There is a day coming when God will visit and take
account of His vineyard. Jeremiah 10:19; Joel 2:11; Nahum 1:2-6.
When God comes, its already determined
Vs. 3 WHERE WILL YOU
LEAVE YOUR GLORY?” i.e. your soul (200 times) Where will you
live your content, that you adored, toiled for, fought fore, lived
for, died for? What are you going to leave your stuff? With all you
have gathered in life, where will you do with it. You will leave
all your glory. If its to the glory of God.... then its another
matter.
Where will you go, to
whom will you go for help? In the day that God comes? God returns to
balance the check book. You fame, your money, will not be of any
value to you then.
ONLY WHAT'S DONE FOR
CHRIST WILL LAST.
Vs. 4 Without
Christ you will be humbled under the sway of the enemy and you shall
be slain in the violence of war you shall be killed.
GOD IS SOVEREIGN IN
ALL AFAIRS OF LIFE 10:5-19
All nations are under the hands of God. They operate within the
bounds of God, what they are believe they are doing, is actually the
doing of God
A
Divine movement, by the divine presence, as an outworking of Divine
and Eternal Purpose.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOOTNOTE: I read this one a website: What I couldn't believe that I wrote these notes back in 1982 and then today I see that there was a book written on "Color of Law"
Rene Netherton’s threats to Claudine Dombrowski to have Kick Start bar injure or kill, M. Jill Dykes physical assault to Claudine in Courthouse hallway, Chris Dykes (husband of ATTY M. Jill Dykes) Call to Claudine of threats to Claudine, Police Reports and complaints, Judge David Debenham, accepting known falsified and inaccurate ‘evidence’ to deny Claudine her basic civil rights. Extreme BIAS.
Including, but not limited to, right to ‘life’ and safety, Right to Due process. David Rodeheffer, Donald Hoffman, Jason Hoffman and others have all: CONSPIRED to commit DEPRIVATION of CIVIL RIGHTS under the COLOR OF LAW.
U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.
Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.
During 2009, the FBI investigated 385 color of law cases. Most of these crimes fall into five broad areas:
- Excessive force;
- Sexual assaults;
- False arrest and fabrication of evidence;
- Deprivation of property; and
- Failure to keep from harm.
Sexual assaults by officials acting under color of law can happen in jails, during traffic stops, or in other settings where officials might use their position of authority to coerce an individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the person if he or she doesn’t comply.
False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person's civil rights may occur.
Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process; the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. During an arrest or detention, these rights can be violated by the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.
Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.
Posted by The Rape of Justice at 7:32
AM
